{"id":2002,"date":"2022-05-23T15:22:07","date_gmt":"2022-05-23T15:22:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inclusivecourts.pt\/?p=2002"},"modified":"2022-05-23T16:09:42","modified_gmt":"2022-05-23T16:09:42","slug":"tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-proc-7662-2005-9-07-07-2005","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inclusivecourts.pt\/en\/tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-proc-7662-2005-9-07-07-2005\/","title":{"rendered":"Lisbon Court of Appeal, proc. 7662\/2005-9, 07.07.2005"},"content":{"rendered":"

MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE | AFRICAN ETHNICITY | SKIN COLOUR | NATIONAL CITIZEN | RACIST ATTITUDE | SUBJECTIVITY | HYPERSENSIBILITY | FUTILE MOTIVE<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Lisbon Court of Appeal, proc. 7662\/2005-9, 07.07.2005<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

JURISDICTION: Criminal<\/p>\n

SUBJECT: Motion to recuse judge<\/p>\n

RAPPORTEUR: Almeida Cabral<\/p>\n

RULING: Denies the motion to recuse the judge.<\/p>\n

DOMESTIC LAW:<\/p>\n

Code of Criminal Procedure [Articles 43, 45(2)]<\/p>\n

Supreme Court of Justice, proc. 3\/96.187, 06.11.1996<\/p>\n

Coimbra Court of Appeal, proc. 5\/92-92, 02.12.1992<\/p>\n

Coimbra Court of Appeal, proc. 4\/96-62, 10.07.1996<\/p>\n

INTERNATIONAL LAW: n.a.<\/p>\n

FOREIGN LAW: n.a.<\/p>\n

KEYWORDS: Motion to recuse Judge ; born on African soil, then Portuguese territory; Guinea-Bissau; Guinean; national citizen; skin colour; trial hearing; honour and respect; attitudes with a racial connotation; embarrassment; average citizen; documentary proof of nationality ; false statements; possible crime of racial insult; predisposition to convict; partiality; unusual opinions; interruption of the allegations by the defence; High Commissioner for Ethnic Minorities; subjective conviction; judge\u2019s alleged bias; offensive; insulting; defamatory; insinuation of a racist attitude on the part of the Court; person of African ethnicity; Angolan; Radio Africa; African music; Angola; Madeira as geographically Africa while legally Europe; African rhythms; acquaintances and friendships with people of African ethnicity; exaggerated sensitivity to racial issues; distrust about the judge's impartiality; pure subjective conviction; pure subjectivity; hypersensitivity; natural judge principle; futile motive; pure fantasies; whims; lower affection for the person of the judge; good faith; fundamental rights; defendant\u2019s rights; European ethnicity; residence permit; subconscious<\/p>\n

COMMENTS: Coming soon.<\/p>\n

REFERENCES IN THE LITERATURE:<\/p>\n

FRIEDRICH, Nicole, Diferen\u00e7a Cultural Sub Judice: Minorias \u00c9tnicas na Jurisprud\u00eancia dos Tribunais Superiores Portugueses [Cultural Difference in Court: Ethnic Minorities in the Case Law of Portuguese Higher Courts], Braga, University of Minho, 2022, available at https:\/\/repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt\/?locale=en.<\/p>\n

Download the ruling.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RECUSA DE JUIZ | ETNIA AFRICANA | COR DE PELE | CIDAD\u00c3O NACIONAL | ATITUDE RACISTA | SUBJETIVISMO | SENSIBILIDADE | MOTIVO F\u00daTIL   Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa, proc. 7662\/2005-9, 07.07.2005 \u00a0 JURISDI\u00c7\u00c3O: Criminal ASSUNTO: Recusa de juiz JUIZ RELATOR: Almeida Cabral DECIS\u00c3O: Indefere o pedido de recusa de juiz formulado pelo arguido. REFER\u00caNCIAS…<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":875,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1581,1580,1579,1386,1069,1578,1583,1582],"tags":[1599,1230,1480,1590,1589,1624,1620,1618,1591,1588,1609,1600,1435,1593,1611,1603,1622,1621,1422,1623,1594,1586,1587,1615,1560,1602,1604,1601,1598,1597,1595,1607,1619,1077,1612,1606,1585,1596,1616,1592,1617,1613,1614,1605,1584,1608,1610,1625,1553],"class_list":["post-2002","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-atitude-racista","category-cidadao-nacional","category-cor-de-pele","category-etnia-africana","category-motivo-futil","category-recusa-de-juiz","category-sensibilidade","category-subjetivismo","tag-alto-comissariado-para-as-minorias-etnicas","tag-angola","tag-angolana","tag-atitudes-de-expressao-racial","tag-audiencia-de-discussao-e-julgamento","tag-autorizacao-de-residencia","tag-boa-fe","tag-caprichos","tag-cidadao-medio","tag-cidadao-nacional-portugues","tag-conhecimentos-e-amizades-com-pessoas-de-etnia-africana","tag-convencimento-subjetivo","tag-cor-de-pele","tag-declaracoes-falsas","tag-desconfianca-sobre-a-imparcialidade-do-juiz","tag-difamatorio","tag-direitos-do-arguido","tag-direitos-fundamentais","tag-etnia-africana","tag-etnia-europeia","tag-eventual-crime-de-injuria-de-cariz-racial","tag-guine-bissau","tag-guineense","tag-hipersensibilidade","tag-honra-e-consideracao","tag-injurioso","tag-insinuacao-de-atitude-racista-por-parte-do-tribunal","tag-insultuoso","tag-interrupcao-das-alegacoes-da-defesa","tag-inusitadas-opinioes","tag-juizo-de-pre-condenacao","tag-madeira-como-geograficamente-africa-embora-juridicamente-europa","tag-menor-afeicao-pela-pessoa-do-julgador","tag-motivo-futil","tag-motivo-serio-e-grave","tag-musica-africana","tag-nascido-em-solo-africano-entao-territorio-portugues","tag-parcialidade","tag-principio-do-juiz-natural","tag-prova-documental-da-nacionalidade","tag-puras-fantasias","tag-puro-convencimento-subjetivo","tag-puros-subjetivismos","tag-radio-africa","tag-recusa-de-juiz","tag-ritmos-africanos","tag-sensibilidade-exacerbada-as-questoes-racicas","tag-subconsciente","tag-vexame"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inclusivecourts.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2002","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inclusivecourts.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inclusivecourts.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inclusivecourts.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inclusivecourts.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2002"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/inclusivecourts.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2002\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2003,"href":"https:\/\/inclusivecourts.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2002\/revisions\/2003"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inclusivecourts.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/875"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inclusivecourts.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2002"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inclusivecourts.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2002"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inclusivecourts.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}